Introduction

This report summarizes the results of public input, encompassing:

• 120 statements
• 26,104 votes
• 11 topics
• 66 subtopics

All voters were anonymous.

Overview

Below is a high level overview of the topics discussed in the conversation, as well as the percentage of statements categorized under each topic. Note that the percentages may add up to greater than 100% when statements fall under more than one topic.

• Road safety and traffic issues (26%): Statements highlighted concerns about speeding, inadequate pedestrian infrastructure, and insufficient traffic calming measures, alongside calls for improved road maintenance, lighting, and enforcement of traffic and parking rules.
• Youth activities and anti-social behaviour (25%): Statements emphasized a lack of youth facilities and structured activities as a driver of anti-social behavior, with calls for increased police presence, better lighting, and youth programs.
• Community engagement and reporting (23%): Statements stressed the need for stronger collaboration between authorities and the community, clearer communication of reporting channels, and better promotion of safety initiatives.
• Public space maintenance (21%): Statements raised concerns about deteriorating infrastructure, inadequate lighting, littering, fly-tipping, and vandalism, with calls for better upkeep and clearer reporting processes.
• Police presence and visibility (20%): Statements called for greater police presence and visibility, with many requesting more frequent patrols in specific areas to deter crime and address anti-social behavior.
• Street lighting and visibility (18%): Statements highlighted widespread concerns about inadequate street lighting across public paths, parks, and transport hubs, emphasizing how poor visibility contributes to safety risks.
• Infrastructure and pavement conditions (13%): Statements cited potholes, uneven surfaces, and poor maintenance as persistent safety hazards, particularly for vulnerable users, alongside calls for improved accessibility and seasonal maintenance.
• Public transport and accessibility (10%): Statements raised concerns about limited service availability, early terminations, and nighttime safety issues, alongside infrastructure challenges like unsafe crossings and poor lighting.
• Community safety initiatives and prevention (8%): Statements emphasized the need for preventative education, proactive policing, and community vigilance to address nighttime safety concerns and deter crime.
• Drug and substance misuse (5%): Statements raised concerns about the visibility of public drug use and its impact on youth, with calls for stronger enforcement and preventive measures.
• Other (7%): Statements discussed varying perceptions of safety across different areas, with some noting discomfort in certain locations and others expressing a sense of security in their residences.

Top 5 Most Discussed Subtopics

66 subtopics of discussion emerged. These 5 subtopics had the most statements submitted.

1. Speeding and traffic enforcement (19 statements)

Prominent themes were:

• Speeding on residential roads
• Need for traffic calming measures
• Insufficient pedestrian crossings
• Poor road and pavement safety
• Lack of enforcement of speed limits

2. Increased police patrols and visibility (18 statements)

Prominent themes were:

• Increased police visibility
• Deterrence through patrols
• Nighttime safety concerns
• Community warden presence
• Crime prevention focus

3. Anti-social behaviour by youth (e.g., vandalism, intimidation, noise) (14 statements)

Prominent themes were:

• Lack of youth activities
• Intimidation and harassment
• Vandalism and property damage
• Public nuisance (noise, litter)
• Insufficient law enforcement presence

4. Collaboration between authorities and community (14 statements)

Prominent themes were:

• Community policing and patrols
• Public safety infrastructure
• Youth engagement and activities
• Reporting and communication
• Environmental and maintenance concerns

5. Communication and awareness of reporting channels (13 statements)

Prominent themes were:

• Lack of awareness of reporting channels
• Need for better safety communication
• Insufficient police/warden presence
• Poor infrastructure and maintenance
• Community collaboration gaps

Topics

From the statements submitted, 11 high level topics were identified, as well as 66 subtopics. Based on voting patterns both points of common ground as well as differences of opinion have been identified and are described below.

Road safety and traffic issues (31 statements)

This topic included 7 subtopics, comprising a total of 31 statements.

Speeding and traffic enforcement (19 statements)

This subtopic had high alignment compared to the other subtopics.

Prominent themes were:

• Speeding Concerns: Many statements highlight excessive vehicle speeds on various roads, including Old Inverkip Road, Dunlop Street, Port Glasgow Road, and Bridge of Weir Road.
• Traffic Calming Measures: Statements frequently suggest solutions like speed cameras, traffic lights, speed bumps, and better enforcement of speed limits to address speeding.
• Pedestrian Safety Issues: Multiple statements express concerns about unsafe pedestrian crossings, lack of visibility, and inadequate infrastructure for pedestrians, especially near schools and residential areas.
• Parking And Congestion Problems: Several statements mention insufficient parking spaces, congestion in villages, and dangerous parking practices, particularly around schools and main roads.
• Enforcement And Awareness Gaps: Statements note a need for greater police or warden presence, better signage, and clearer reporting mechanisms for traffic and safety concerns.

Common ground: No statements met the thresholds necessary to be considered as a point of common ground (at least 20 votes, and at least 70% agreement).

Differences of opinion: There was disagreement on community safety concerns, with one statement proposing more traffic monitoring at schools while another highlighted speeding on Bridge of Weir Road. Additional comments raised issues like dog fouling, insufficient street lighting, and unsafe pedestrian crossings. Some participants also suggested solutions such as traffic lights, pedestrian days, and better road signage. Concerns about nighttime safety and enforcement of speed limits were also mentioned. [comment_682,comment_655,comment_617,comment_619,comment_629,comment_660,comment_612,comment_684,comment_680,comment_675,comment_631,comment_645]

Traffic calming measures (10 statements)

This subtopic had high alignment compared to the other subtopics.

Prominent themes were:

• Speeding Concerns: Many statements highlight excessive vehicle speeds on various roads as a primary safety issue.
• Traffic Calming Infrastructure: Statements frequently propose measures like traffic lights, speed bumps, and one-way systems to reduce speed and improve safety.
• Pedestrian Safety: Multiple statements express concerns about unsafe road crossings and the need for more pedestrian crossings or traffic lights in residential areas.
• Parking Issues: Several statements mention problematic parking, particularly around schools, commercial areas, and busy junctions.
• Awareness And Reporting: Some statements note uncertainty about how to report safety concerns or suggest improving communication of traffic measures and contact information.

Common ground: No statements met the thresholds necessary to be considered as a point of common ground (at least 20 votes, and at least 70% agreement).

Differences of opinion: There was disagreement on how to address traffic safety, with one statement proposing traffic lights or pedestrian crossings on specific roads, while another suggested making a road one-way and adding speed bumps. Another statement raised concerns about speeding and dangerous U-turns, and another highlighted pavement damage and accessibility issues. Additionally, one statement mentioned underage drinking and littering by large groups of youths. [comment_608,comment_629,comment_647,comment_675,comment_645,comment_679,comment_651,comment_661,comment_605,comment_670]

Pedestrian safety and crossings (9 statements)

This subtopic had high alignment compared to the other subtopics.

Prominent themes were:

• Inadequate Pedestrian Infrastructure: Many statements highlight unsafe or insufficient pedestrian crossings, narrow pavements, and lack of accessibility features like wheelchair-friendly curbs.
• Speeding and Traffic Safety Concerns: Statements frequently mention speeding vehicles, lack of enforcement for speed limits, and the need for traffic calming measures like speed bumps or lights.
• Visibility and Congestion Issues: Reduced visibility due to parked cars, narrow paths, or new developments is a recurring concern, along with traffic congestion in residential areas.
• Need for Improved Signage and Lighting: Multiple statements call for better road signage and street lighting to enhance pedestrian safety, particularly in poorly lit or high-risk areas.
• Uncertainty About Reporting Concerns: Some statements express confusion or lack of confidence in knowing who to report safety issues to or whether reporting would be effective.

Common ground: No statements met the thresholds necessary to be considered as a point of common ground (at least 20 votes, and at least 70% agreement).

Differences of opinion: There was disagreement on specific safety concerns, with one statement highlighting unsafe road crossings and poor infrastructure in areas like Bow Road, Weir Street, and Albert Road, while another raised issues like rodent infestations, fly tipping, and anti-social behavior in Kestrel Crescent. Another statement proposed traffic calming measures and better pedestrian infrastructure, and yet another focused on congestion, accessibility, and enforcement of speed limits. [comment_608,comment_629,comment_632,comment_636,comment_684,comment_662,comment_661,comment_652,comment_630]

Road infrastructure and signage (6 statements)

This subtopic had high alignment compared to the other subtopics.

Prominent themes were:

• Faded And Invisible Signage: Statements highlight concerns about faded give way signs and insufficient road signage throughout the village.
• Road Safety And Speed Enforcement: Statements mention unsafe roads, unenforced speed limits, and the need for traffic calming measures like speed bumps.
• Pedestrian Infrastructure Deficiencies: Statements point to narrow pavements, inaccessible curbs, and unsafe walkways for pedestrians and wheelchair users.
• Traffic Congestion And Management: Statements discuss congestion issues and propose solutions like one-way roads, pedestrian days, and improved traffic flow.
• Lack Of Updates On Planned Infrastructure: Statements express frustration over delayed or uncommunicated updates on planned traffic lights and road changes.

Common ground: No statements met the thresholds necessary to be considered as a point of common ground (at least 20 votes, and at least 70% agreement).

Differences of opinion: There was disagreement on how to address traffic safety, with one statement proposing a one-way system and speed bumps near Daff Avenue, while another highlighted concerns about narrow pavements, faded signs, and unenforced speed limits on Bridge of Weir Road. Participants also raised issues like the lack of traffic light updates at the Sainsbury’s junction and the need for better pedestrian infrastructure. [comment_636,comment_647,comment_684,comment_615,comment_605]

Parking issues and congestion (5 statements)

This subtopic had high alignment compared to the other subtopics.

Prominent themes were:

• Speeding Concerns: Statements highlight unsafe speeds on roads like Bridge of Weir Road and Langhouse Road, with calls for enforcement or traffic lights.
• Insufficient Parking: Multiple statements mention a lack of parking spaces in the village, leading to congestion and safety issues.
• Traffic Congestion: Statements describe congestion in the village, with suggestions like pedestrian days to ease traffic.
• Illegal Parking: Statements note problems with parking on double yellow lines, blocking access and creating safety hazards.
• Road Infrastructure Issues: Statements point to inadequate pavements, poor accessibility, and the need for better road signage.

Common ground: No statements met the thresholds necessary to be considered as a point of common ground (at least 20 votes, and at least 70% agreement).

Differences of opinion: There was disagreement on how to address traffic safety, with one statement proposing traffic lights on Bridge of Weir Road while another suggested a one-way system for parking congestion. Another comment called for better enforcement of speed limits and parking rules, while a different one highlighted the need for improved accessibility on walkways. Some also raised concerns about youth gatherings and littering. [comment_684,comment_675,comment_671,comment_651]

Road maintenance and surface conditions (3 statements)

This subtopic had high alignment compared to the other subtopics.

Prominent themes were:

• Road And Pavement Maintenance: Statements highlight the need for timely road grittings, pavement repairs, and accessibility improvements for wheelchair users.
• Traffic Safety Measures: Statements suggest installing speed cameras, raising awareness about speed limits, and adding traffic lights for safer crossings.
• Public Safety Concerns: Statements mention issues like theft, unsafe areas, and rodent infestations affecting community safety.
• Lighting And Infrastructure: Statements call for better lighting and path repairs to improve safety in specific areas.
• Law Enforcement Presence: Statements request increased visibility of community wardens and police to enhance security.

Common ground: No statements met the thresholds necessary to be considered as a point of common ground (at least 20 votes, and at least 70% agreement).

Differences of opinion: There was disagreement on community safety priorities, with one statement proposing traffic lights or a safer crossing system at Bow Road, improved paths and lighting on Weir Street, and addressing rodent and fly-tipping issues in Kestrel Crescent, while another called for earlier and more frequent road gritting and increased community warden and police presence. Another statement highlighted pavement damage near the Pharmacy on Bridge of Weir Road, accessibility issues for wheelchair users, the need for speed cameras, and concerns about theft at the Co-op in Kilmacolm. [comment_608,comment_610,comment_679]

School zone safety (3 statements)

This subtopic had high alignment compared to the other subtopics.

Prominent themes were:

• School Zone Traffic Concerns: Statements highlight traffic congestion and parking issues around schools, particularly during pick-up and drop-off times.
• Need For Increased Monitoring: Statements suggest deploying more traffic or safety attendants near schools to improve child safety.
• Police Presence And Enforcement: Statements mention the positive role of police in addressing school parking and broader community safety issues.
• Anti-Social Behavior: Statements reference concerns about youth misbehavior, gangs, and intimidation in public spaces.
• Public Transport Safety: Statements express unease about safety on trains, particularly due to alcohol-related incidents.

Common ground: No statements met the thresholds necessary to be considered as a point of common ground (at least 20 votes, and at least 70% agreement).

Differences of opinion: There was disagreement on community safety concerns, with one statement proposing more traffic monitoring and safety attendants at schools, while another highlighted issues like junction safety, antisocial behavior, drug problems, and unsafe trains. Another statement suggested making Kirn Drive a one-way system to address traffic problems in Gourock. [comment_682,comment_662,comment_670]

Youth activities and anti-social behaviour (30 statements)

This topic included 6 subtopics, comprising a total of 30 statements.

Anti-social behaviour by youth (e.g., vandalism, intimidation, noise) (14 statements)

This subtopic had high alignment compared to the other subtopics.

Prominent themes were:

• Lack Of Youth Activities: Many statements highlight that anti-social behaviour stems from young people having insufficient constructive activities or spaces to occupy their time.
• Intimidation And Public Disruption: Statements frequently describe youths engaging in intimidating behaviour, such as loitering in groups, causing noise, or using off-road bikes recklessly in public spaces.
• Vandalism And Property Damage: Multiple statements mention vandalism, including damage to bus stops, pavements, bins, and doors, as a recurring issue linked to youth anti-social behaviour.
• Inadequate Enforcement And Visibility: Several statements call for increased police or community warden presence to deter anti-social behaviour, particularly in areas prone to gatherings or incidents.
• Public Safety Concerns At Night: Statements express unease about safety after dark, citing poor lighting, rowdy behaviour, and the presence of large groups of youths as contributing factors.

Common ground: No statements met the thresholds necessary to be considered as a point of common ground (at least 20 votes, and at least 70% agreement).

Differences of opinion: There was disagreement about the root causes of community safety concerns, with one statement attributing issues to reckless behavior by young people on bikes and in groups, while another suggested that providing meaningful activities for youth could address vandalism and other problems. Another comment proposed increased police or warden visibility as a solution, whereas others highlighted infrastructure issues like poor lighting or damaged pavements as key concerns. Some participants also raised broader systemic problems, such as lack of services or digital inequalities, as contributing to safety issues. [comment_594,comment_617,comment_641,comment_646,comment_590,comment_628,comment_621,comment_616,comment_664,comment_662,comment_674,comment_679]

Youth congregating in public spaces (12 statements)

This subtopic had high alignment compared to the other subtopics.

Prominent themes were:

• Lack Of Youth Facilities: Statements highlight a shortage of designated spaces for young people, leading them to gather in public areas.
• Perceived Intimidation From Youth Groups: Some statements describe large groups of youth as intimidating or associated with anti-social behavior.
• Public Space Neglect And Safety Concerns: Statements mention poorly lit areas, vandalism, and neglected parks contributing to safety issues.
• Need For Increased Surveillance And Enforcement: Statements suggest installing CCTV, increasing police presence, or deploying community wardens to address youth congregations.
• Transportation And Accessibility Issues: Statements note early bus service endings and limited transport options as factors in youth gathering in public spaces.

Common ground: No statements met the thresholds necessary to be considered as a point of common ground (at least 20 votes, and at least 70% agreement).

Differences of opinion: There was disagreement about the causes of and solutions to youth congregating in public spaces, with one statement proposing more police presence and CCTV while another suggested creating more youth activities and clubs. [comment_598,comment_665,comment_577,comment_640,comment_616,comment_662,comment_613,comment_591,comment_651,comment_657,comment_677,comment_678]

Public perception and fear of youth groups (10 statements)

This subtopic had high alignment compared to the other subtopics.

Prominent themes were:

• Perceived Intimidation From Youth Groups: Statements frequently describe large gatherings of young people as intimidating or erratic, particularly in public spaces like bus stops, parks, and beaches.
• Lack Of Youth Activities And Alternatives: Multiple statements note that young people congregate due to a lack of designated spaces or activities for them at night.
• Inadequate Policing And Warden Presence: Many statements call for increased police or community warden patrols, especially in areas where youth groups gather.
• Public Space Safety Concerns: Poor lighting, damaged infrastructure, and littering in areas frequented by youth are cited as contributing to feelings of unsafety.
• Transport-Related Safety Issues: Statements highlight concerns about unsafe behavior on buses, trains, and near transport hubs, often linked to youth groups.

Common ground: No statements met the thresholds necessary to be considered as a point of common ground (at least 20 votes, and at least 70% agreement).

Differences of opinion: There was disagreement about the primary sources of community safety concerns, with one statement highlighting drug users and immigrants as the biggest issues for young people, while another pointed to intimidating behavior from groups of teenagers on buses, beaches, and near shops. Some participants also emphasized poor lighting, lack of youth activities, and reduced police or community warden presence as key problems. [comment_581,comment_665,comment_594,comment_628,comment_621,comment_577,comment_662,comment_639,comment_657,comment_677]

Underage drinking and substance use (7 statements)

This subtopic had high alignment compared to the other subtopics.

Prominent themes were:

• Public Spaces And Underage Drinking: Many statements highlight concerns about young people gathering in public areas like bike tracks, beaches, and parks to drink alcohol.
• Lack Of Enforcement Or Supervision: Several statements mention the absence of police or wardens in areas where underage drinking and rowdy behavior occur.
• Impact On Community Safety: Statements describe how underage drinking and substance use contribute to feelings of unsafety, intimidation, and litter in public spaces.
• Transportation And Mobility Concerns: Some statements note that public transport (e.g., trains, buses) is affected by underage drinking, making travel intimidating.
• Need For Preventative Measures: A few statements suggest solutions like better lighting, community wardens, or meaningful activities to address underage drinking and substance use.

Common ground: No statements met the thresholds necessary to be considered as a point of common ground (at least 20 votes, and at least 70% agreement).

Differences of opinion: There was disagreement about the effectiveness of current safety measures, with one statement praising police presence in schools while another criticized the lack of wardens on the bike track. Some participants highlighted issues like underage drinking, littering, and intimidating behavior in public spaces, while others suggested solutions such as better lighting, one-way systems, and clearer contact information for wardens. Concerns about speeding cars, poor bus services, and drug problems were also raised. [comment_665,comment_569,comment_604,comment_662,comment_651,comment_657,comment_568]

Lack of youth facilities and activities (6 statements)

This subtopic had high alignment compared to the other subtopics.

Prominent themes were:

• Lack Of Youth Facilities: The statements highlight a shortage of dedicated spaces or activities for young people, leading to them gathering in public areas.
• Public Gatherings Of Youth: Many statements mention large groups of young people congregating in public spaces due to limited alternatives.
• Perceived Intimidation: Some statements express concern about the presence of youth groups being intimidating, particularly in the evenings or at night.
• Calls For Youth Programs: Several statements suggest the need for structured activities or clubs to engage young people.
• Inadequate Community Resources: Statements note the absence of recreational facilities like tennis courts or paddling ponds, contributing to the lack of options for youth.

Common ground: No statements met the thresholds necessary to be considered as a point of common ground (at least 20 votes, and at least 70% agreement).

Differences of opinion: There was disagreement about the perceived safety of the community, with one statement noting a feeling of safety during the day but not at night, while another expressed comfort walking home at night. Opinions also differed on the presence of young people, with some participants describing large gatherings as intimidating, while others suggested creating more spaces and activities for them. Some participants called for increased visibility of wardens or police, while another mentioned that wardens were not frequently seen. Additionally, one statement highlighted concerns about unsafe infrastructure, such as a broken park gate near a main road. [comment_594,comment_646,comment_577,comment_613,comment_591]

Need for youth engagement and diversion programs (4 statements)

This subtopic had high alignment compared to the other subtopics.

Prominent themes were:

• Youth Engagement Opportunities: Statements highlight the need for structured activities or programs to channel youth energy productively.
• Funding For Youth Programs: Some statements call for increased financial support for youth-focused initiatives.
• Lack Of Safe Spaces For Youth: Statements note that young people gather in public areas due to a lack of designated spaces.
• Addressing Addiction Through Activities: Statements suggest meaningful activities as a way to mitigate substance-related issues.
• Promotion Of Youth Activities: Statements emphasize the need for better advertising of available programs in schools.

Common ground: No statements met the thresholds necessary to be considered as a point of common ground (at least 20 votes, and at least 70% agreement).

Differences of opinion: There was disagreement on how to address community safety, with one statement suggesting improved street lighting and support for transport police, while another proposed opening a youth club with daily activities. Another comment highlighted concerns about vandalism and the need for meaningful activities for young people. [comment_604,comment_658,comment_641,comment_613]

Community engagement and reporting (28 statements)

This topic included 5 subtopics, comprising a total of 28 statements.

Collaboration between authorities and community (14 statements)

This subtopic had high alignment compared to the other subtopics.

Prominent themes were:

• Need For Increased Authority Presence: Statements frequently call for more police, wardens, or patrols to address safety concerns.
• Improved Communication And Reporting: Many statements highlight the need for clearer communication between authorities and the community, including better advertising of reporting channels.
• Infrastructure And Environmental Safety: Statements mention issues like poor lighting, deteriorating infrastructure, and littering as safety concerns.
• Youth Engagement And Behavior: Several statements express concerns about youth behavior, loitering, and the lack of activities for young people.
• Community Confidence In Authorities: Some statements indicate a lack of confidence in authorities' ability to address safety concerns effectively.

Common ground: No statements met the thresholds necessary to be considered as a point of common ground (at least 20 votes, and at least 70% agreement).

Differences of opinion: There was disagreement on community safety concerns, with one statement highlighting issues with youths and insufficient activities for them, while another focused on infrastructure problems like deteriorating gutters and fly-tipping. Some participants suggested increasing warden visibility and police presence, whereas others emphasized the need for better lighting, CCTV, and clearer reporting mechanisms. Concerns also varied between specific areas, such as unsafe park gates or poorly lit cycle tracks, and broader issues like lack of confidence in authorities. [comment_646,comment_622,comment_626,comment_628,comment_577,comment_601,comment_685,comment_635,comment_651,comment_603,comment_657,comment_589]

Communication and awareness of reporting channels (13 statements)

This subtopic had high alignment compared to the other subtopics.

Prominent themes were:

• Lack Of Awareness Of Reporting Channels: Many statements express uncertainty about who to contact or how to report safety concerns.
• Need For Better Promotion Of Reporting Options: Several statements highlight that reporting channels should be advertised more clearly.
• Concerns About Physical Safety In Public Spaces: Statements frequently mention unsafe roads, poor lighting, and other environmental hazards.
• Requests For Increased Police Or Warden Presence: Multiple statements call for more visible law enforcement or community wardens to address safety issues.
• Use Of Community Communication Methods: Some statements suggest leveraging social media, noticeboards, or online meetings to improve safety awareness.

Common ground: No statements met the thresholds necessary to be considered as a point of common ground (at least 20 votes, and at least 70% agreement).

Differences of opinion: There was disagreement on the primary safety concerns, with one statement highlighting drug users and immigrants as the biggest issues for young people, while another focused on traffic dangers like speeding cars and lack of pedestrian crossings. Opinions also differed on solutions, with some participants advocating for more lighting, wardens, or police presence, and others suggesting infrastructure changes like one-way systems or traffic calming measures. Additionally, while some emphasized the need to advertise reporting channels, others noted uncertainty about who to contact for non-police matters. [comment_581,comment_623,comment_626,comment_601,comment_663,comment_635,comment_687,comment_597,comment_575,comment_651,comment_661,comment_657]

Reporting mechanisms and confidence (8 statements)

This subtopic had high alignment compared to the other subtopics.

Prominent themes were:

• Awareness Of Reporting Mechanisms: Some statements indicate uncertainty about how or where to report non-police safety concerns.
• Confidence In Reporting: Confidence in reporting varies, with some expressing confidence and others having zero confidence in action being taken.
• Visibility Of Authorities: Increased visibility of wardens or patrols is suggested as a way to improve safety in certain areas.
• Youth-Related Concerns: Several statements highlight issues with youth behavior, such as loitering or causing disturbances.
• Infrastructure For Safety: Suggestions include improving lighting, adding cameras, and installing additional defibrillators to enhance community safety.

Common ground: No statements met the thresholds necessary to be considered as a point of common ground (at least 20 votes, and at least 70% agreement).

Differences of opinion: There was disagreement on community safety concerns, with one statement noting uncertainty about reporting non-police matters and lacking confidence in the process, while another expressed confidence in reporting to the community council. One participant suggested higher visibility of wardens could help with youth-related issues, while another proposed a curfew on free bus travel for youngsters and more patrols. Some participants felt their community was generally safe, while others highlighted specific concerns like erratic youth behavior or insufficient lighting. [comment_623,comment_646,comment_668,comment_628,comment_676,comment_589,comment_678,comment_602]

Community forums and meetings (4 statements)

This subtopic had high alignment compared to the other subtopics.

Prominent themes were:

• Community Safety Concerns: Statements highlight specific safety issues like broken infrastructure (e.g., Dubbs Road park gate) and environmental conditions that create unsafe perceptions.
• Police And Warden Presence: Multiple statements call for increased police patrols and note the reduced visibility of community wardens.
• Youth Engagement And Behavior: Some statements express concerns about groups of young people loitering and the lack of activities for them.
• Communication And Reporting Clarity: Statements mention uncertainty about who to report safety concerns to and suggest improving clarity in reporting processes.
• Community Forums And Meetings: Statements propose more community forums, including online options, to address concerns and improve collaboration.

Common ground: No statements met the thresholds necessary to be considered as a point of common ground (at least 20 votes, and at least 70% agreement).

Differences of opinion: There was disagreement on community safety concerns, with one statement highlighting unsafe park conditions due to a broken gate near a main road, while another noted feeling safe in the community. Another statement proposed more police presence, and a different one suggested moving community meetings online to address concerns. Additionally, one participant called for clearer communication on repairs and reporting concerns, while another requested more community forums. [comment_577,comment_574,comment_597,comment_576]

Public engagement initiatives (3 statements)

This subtopic had high alignment compared to the other subtopics.

Prominent themes were:

• Community Engagement Opportunities: Statements highlight the need for more local community engagement to foster connections and discuss concerns.
• Police Involvement In Schools: Statements suggest that local police should increase their presence in schools to improve engagement.
• Neighborhood Awareness: Statements mention a lack of familiarity with the neighborhood due to long working hours.
• Collaborative Problem-Solving: Statements imply that community engagement could facilitate discussions to address safety concerns.
• Building Local Relationships: Statements emphasize the potential for community engagement to help neighbors get to know each other.

Common ground: No statements met the thresholds necessary to be considered as a point of common ground (at least 20 votes, and at least 70% agreement).

Differences of opinion: There was disagreement on how to improve community safety, with one statement proposing more police talks in schools to boost engagement, while another suggested more local community engagement to help neighbors meet and discuss concerns, and a third noted that long work hours and unfamiliarity with the neighborhood hinder involvement. [comment_622,comment_625,comment_653]

Public space maintenance (25 statements)

This topic included 8 subtopics, comprising a total of 25 statements.

Pavement and road conditions (8 statements)

This subtopic had high alignment compared to the other subtopics.

Prominent themes were:

• Poor Pavement And Road Conditions: Statements frequently highlight uneven pavements, potholes, and deteriorating infrastructure as safety hazards.
• Inadequate Maintenance And Repairs: Many statements express frustration over the lack of regular maintenance, including road sweeping, gritting, and gutter repairs.
• Obstructed Walkways: Multiple statements mention pavement parking and other obstructions that hinder accessibility, particularly for vulnerable groups.
• Lighting And Visibility Concerns: Several statements call for improved lighting in public paths, parks, and lanes to enhance safety.
• Unclear Reporting Processes: Some statements note confusion or lack of clarity about how and to whom safety concerns should be reported.

Common ground: No statements met the thresholds necessary to be considered as a point of common ground (at least 20 votes, and at least 70% agreement).

Differences of opinion: There was disagreement on specific safety priorities, with one statement proposing more lighting on Fore Street while another highlighted fly tipping on King Street, and others emphasized pavement maintenance, rodent control, or better signage for reporting concerns. [comment_626,comment_601,comment_637,comment_643,comment_642,comment_627,comment_649,comment_597]

Dog fouling (7 statements)

This subtopic had high alignment compared to the other subtopics.

Prominent themes were:

• Prevalence Of Dog Fouling: Statements frequently highlight dog fouling as a widespread issue in various locations.
• Specific Locations Affected: Multiple statements identify particular areas, such as Battery Park, Belville Gardens, and Quarriers Street, as hotspots for dog fouling.
• Community Responsibility: Some statements mention individuals taking personal action, like picking up dog waste, to address the problem.
• Public Awareness And Solutions: Statements suggest potential solutions, such as more dog litter bins or public awareness campaigns, to mitigate the issue.
• Broader Safety Concerns: Dog fouling is often mentioned alongside other community safety issues, like speeding cars or vandalism.

Common ground: No statements met the thresholds necessary to be considered as a point of common ground (at least 20 votes, and at least 70% agreement).

Differences of opinion: There was disagreement about the causes of and solutions to dog fouling, with one statement noting it as a widespread issue in areas like Battery Park, Quarriers Street, and Weymss Bay, while another suggested more dog litter bins or public awareness as potential remedies. [comment_617,comment_659,comment_612,comment_584,comment_573]

Public lighting (6 statements)

This subtopic had high alignment compared to the other subtopics.

Prominent themes were:

• Inadequate Public Lighting: Many statements highlight insufficient lighting in public paths, parks, and streets as a safety concern.
• Poor Visibility And Obstructions: Some statements mention visibility issues due to natural obstructions like trees and bushes or inadequate lighting.
• Maintenance Of Public Spaces: Several statements address the need for better maintenance of public areas, including paths, gutters, and lanes.
• Safety In Specific Locations: Statements frequently identify particular areas (e.g., Fore Street, Gourock Park, Bow Road) as unsafe due to lighting or other hazards.
• Excessive Or Misplaced Lighting: A minority of statements note concerns about over-lighting in certain areas, such as Battery Park, and its cost.

Common ground: No statements met the thresholds necessary to be considered as a point of common ground (at least 20 votes, and at least 70% agreement).

Differences of opinion: There was disagreement on specific safety concerns, with one statement highlighting unsafe road crossings and rodent issues in Auchmountain, while another focused on lighting and warden presence in Port Glasgow. Other statements addressed pavement conditions, parking violations, and inadequate lighting in Gourock Park, as well as fears related to fireworks and bus stop safety at night. [comment_608,comment_626,comment_642,comment_649,comment_596,comment_609]

Littering and fly-tipping (5 statements)

This subtopic had high alignment compared to the other subtopics.

Prominent themes were:

• Public Safety Concerns: Statements highlight issues like poor lighting, unsafe crossings, and deteriorating infrastructure as safety hazards.
• Fly-Tipping And Littering: Multiple statements mention fly-tipping (e.g., mattresses, King Street) and littering (e.g., village centre to war memorial) as persistent problems.
• Warden And Enforcement Support: Some statements call for more wardens, better communication with police, and clearer advertising of warden contact details.
• Infrastructure And Maintenance: Concerns include deteriorating gutters, unsafe paths, and insufficient bike locking areas.
• Event-Related Mess: One statement notes annual littering issues tied to local fireworks displays, impacting factor fees.

Common ground: No statements met the thresholds necessary to be considered as a point of common ground (at least 20 votes, and at least 70% agreement).

Differences of opinion: There was disagreement on specific safety concerns, with one statement proposing traffic lights or a safer crossing system at Bow Road while another highlighted deteriorating gutters in Church Street as a hazard. Another statement called for more lighting on Fore Street, Port Glasgow, while a different one emphasized the need for better lighting at bus stops. One statement also raised the issue of fly tipping in Kestrel Crescent, while another mentioned the same problem at King Street, Port Glasgow. [comment_608,comment_626,comment_685,comment_596]

Public park and green space upkeep (5 statements)

This subtopic had high alignment compared to the other subtopics.

Prominent themes were:

• Maintenance Of Public Spaces: Statements highlight concerns about the upkeep of parks, pavements, and reservoirs, including issues like vandalism and inadequate maintenance.
• Safety And Accessibility In Parks: Statements mention safety hazards in parks, such as broken gates, inadequate lighting, and anti-social behavior, affecting usability.
• Lack Of Youth Facilities: Statements note the absence of recreational facilities like tennis courts and paddling ponds, leading to youth congregating in public spaces.
• Infrastructure And Urban Design Issues: Statements point to poorly maintained pavements, illegal parking, and poorly placed signage as safety and accessibility concerns.
• Anti-Social Behavior In Green Spaces: Statements describe vandalism, smashed bottles, and large crowds in parks contributing to perceptions of unsafe environments.

Common ground: No statements met the thresholds necessary to be considered as a point of common ground (at least 20 votes, and at least 70% agreement).

Differences of opinion: There was disagreement on community safety concerns, with one statement highlighting unsafe park gates and lack of activities for youth, while another raised issues like neglected parks, digital inequalities, and inaccessible services. Another comment focused on poorly maintained pavements and illegal parking, and a further statement emphasized the need for better maintenance of reservoirs and pavements along with multi-agency collaboration. [comment_577,comment_616,comment_642,comment_627]

Graffiti and vandalism (4 statements)

This subtopic had high alignment compared to the other subtopics.

Prominent themes were:

• Graffiti as a sign of neglect: Statements highlight graffiti as an indicator of community neglect and unwelcoming environments.
• Vandalism in public spaces: Statements mention vandalism, such as smashed bottles and burned seating, as a safety concern in parks and public areas.
• Lack of reporting knowledge: Statements note uncertainty about how to report concerns, including graffiti and vandalism.
• Anti-social behavior in parks: Statements describe parks as hubs for anti-social behavior, including vandalism and large gatherings.
• Inadequate public infrastructure: Statements reference poor lighting and damaged facilities as contributing to safety issues in public spaces.

Common ground: No statements met the thresholds necessary to be considered as a point of common ground (at least 20 votes, and at least 70% agreement).

Differences of opinion: There was disagreement about the primary safety concerns in the community, with one statement highlighting issues like neglected parks, digital inequalities, and inaccessible services, while another focused on offensive graffiti and neglect in Port Glasgow. Another statement emphasized dangerous pavements, illegal parking, and inadequate lighting in Gourock Park, and a further comment raised concerns about graffiti and a lack of awareness on how to report safety issues. [comment_616,comment_570,comment_642,comment_687]

Waste management and bin infrastructure (4 statements)

This subtopic had high alignment compared to the other subtopics.

Prominent themes were:

• Bin Infrastructure Improvements: Statements highlight the need for more secure, functional, or aesthetically pleasing bin designs, such as shut-over public bins or large metal refuse bins.
• Maintenance Neglect: Statements point to inadequate upkeep of public spaces, including smelly drains, uneven pavements, and unmaintained lanes.
• Lighting and Safety: Statements emphasize the need for better lighting in parks, lanes, and streets to enhance pedestrian safety.
• Road and Pavement Conditions: Statements mention concerns about potholes, icy pavements, and the lack of road sweeping or gritting in certain areas.
• Vandalism and Misuse: Statements reference issues like children burning bins and dog fouling as safety and cleanliness concerns.

Common ground: No statements met the thresholds necessary to be considered as a point of common ground (at least 20 votes, and at least 70% agreement).

Differences of opinion: There was disagreement on community safety priorities, with one statement highlighting speeding cars, dog fouling, and bin burning as key issues, while another proposed replacing plastic bins with large metal ones to reduce clutter and improve aesthetics. Another participant emphasized the need for better maintenance, such as fixing drains, pavements, and potholes. A further statement focused on lighting and infrastructure improvements, including adding lights in Gourock Park and Binnie Lane, as well as better road sweeping and gritting. [comment_617,comment_648,comment_643,comment_649]

Rodent and pest control (2 statements)

This subtopic had high alignment compared to the other subtopics.

Prominent themes were:

• Rodent Infestations: Statements highlight rodent problems in specific areas like Kestrel Crescent.
• Fly Tipping: Statements mention fly tipping as a safety concern in certain neighborhoods.
• Infrastructure Maintenance: Statements call for repairs to paths, pavements, and lighting to improve safety.
• Traffic Safety: Statements request traffic lights or safer crossing systems at dangerous locations.
• Reporting Clarity: Statements suggest the need for clearer communication on how to report safety concerns.

Common ground: No statements met the thresholds necessary to be considered as a point of common ground (at least 20 votes, and at least 70% agreement).

Differences of opinion: There was disagreement on specific safety concerns, with one statement highlighting unsafe crossing at Bow Road, poor path conditions on Weir Street, and rodent and fly-tipping issues in Kestrel Crescent, while another emphasized pavement obstructions from parked cars, the need for more wardens or police, and unclear reporting processes for safety concerns. [comment_608,comment_601]

Police presence and visibility (24 statements)

This topic included 5 subtopics, comprising a total of 24 statements.

Increased police patrols and visibility (18 statements)

This subtopic had high alignment compared to the other subtopics.

Prominent themes were:

• Demand For Increased Police Patrols: Many statements explicitly call for more frequent or visible police presence to deter crime and address safety concerns.
• Perceived Lack Of Police Visibility: Several statements highlight that police are rarely seen or only appear after incidents occur, rather than proactively patrolling.
• Need For Targeted Patrols In Specific Areas: Statements frequently request police presence in particular locations like parks, bus stations, and near shops to address loitering or anti-social behavior.
• Complementary Measures Alongside Patrols: Some statements pair calls for increased patrols with requests for better lighting, CCTV, or community wardens to enhance safety.
• Skepticism About Reporting And Follow-Up: A few statements express low confidence in reporting concerns, noting that past reports to police or wardens were not acted upon.

Common ground: No statements met the thresholds necessary to be considered as a point of common ground (at least 20 votes, and at least 70% agreement).

Differences of opinion: There was disagreement on the perceived safety of the community, with one statement noting a general sense of safety while others highlighted concerns about increasing violent crime, intimidating behavior from groups of young people, and unsafe areas like parks and bus stations. Participants also differed on the effectiveness of current measures, with some calling for more police and warden presence, better lighting, and clearer reporting channels, while others felt these efforts were already insufficient or poorly implemented. [comment_585,comment_673,comment_569,comment_628,comment_621,comment_577,comment_601,comment_662,comment_635,comment_610,comment_588,comment_611]

Collaboration between police and community wardens (12 statements)

This subtopic had high alignment compared to the other subtopics.

Prominent themes were:

• Insufficient Police and Warden Presence: Statements frequently highlight a lack of visible police and community wardens in various areas.
• Need for Improved Lighting: Multiple statements mention inadequate lighting in public spaces as a safety concern.
• Anti-Social Behavior by Youths: Several statements describe issues with youth groups causing intimidation or damage.
• Reporting and Communication Gaps: Statements note confusion or lack of clarity on how to report safety concerns.
• Infrastructure and Maintenance Issues: Some statements raise concerns about potholes, deteriorating gutters, and other maintenance problems.

Common ground: No statements met the thresholds necessary to be considered as a point of common ground (at least 20 votes, and at least 70% agreement).

Differences of opinion: There was disagreement on the specific safety concerns, with one statement highlighting a lack of police and warden presence in certain areas while another noted feeling safe walking at night. Some statements called for more lighting and warden patrols, while others emphasized issues like fly-tipping, deteriorating infrastructure, or youth behavior. [comment_585,comment_569,comment_646,comment_626,comment_621,comment_577,comment_601,comment_662,comment_610,comment_587,comment_677,comment_638]

Police engagement with communities (2 statements)

This subtopic had high alignment compared to the other subtopics.

Prominent themes were:

• Community Policing Presence: Statements highlight the need for more police officers actively patrolling neighborhoods.
• Police Integration In Communities: Statements suggest police should reside within the communities they serve.
• Community Engagement Forums: Statements propose increasing community forums to discuss safety concerns.
• Nighttime Safety Concerns: Statements mention reduced comfort with going out at night.
• Neighborhood Diversity: Statements emphasize the importance of variety within neighborhoods.

Common ground: No statements met the thresholds necessary to be considered as a point of common ground (at least 20 votes, and at least 70% agreement).

Differences of opinion: There was disagreement on community safety, with one statement proposing that police should live within communities, while another suggested that more police are needed on the beat. [comment_644,comment_576]

Police response times and follow-up (2 statements)

This subtopic had high alignment compared to the other subtopics.

Prominent themes were:

• Lack Of Police Presence: Statements highlight a perceived shortage of visible police or wardens in the community.
• Poor Follow-Up On Reports: Statements mention that reports to wardens or police often go without subsequent action.
• Long Response Times: Statements note delays in police or warden response to incidents like anti-social behavior.
• Infrastructure Concerns: Statements reference non-safety issues like potholes affecting local conditions.
• Positive Safety Initiatives: Statements acknowledge improvements like new lighting in public spaces.

Common ground: No statements met the thresholds necessary to be considered as a point of common ground (at least 20 votes, and at least 70% agreement).

Differences of opinion: There was disagreement about the effectiveness of current safety measures, with one statement noting a lack of police and warden presence and slow response times, while another praised new lighting in Battery Park but criticized poor road conditions and follow-up on reports. [comment_585,comment_587]

Police resources and capacity (2 statements)

This subtopic had high alignment compared to the other subtopics.

Prominent themes were:

• Police Resource Shortages: Statements highlight that police lack sufficient resources to address issues like public drug use.
• Public Drug Use Concerns: Statements note visible drug consumption in public spaces with little police intervention.
• Link Between Crime And Mental Health: Statements connect crime to mental health and drug issues, citing systemic failures.
• Need For Enforcement Of Drug Laws: Statements advocate for fines or penalties for public drug use to deter such behavior.
• Impact Of Drug Use On Families: Statements describe the devastating effects of drugs like cocaine on families.

Common ground: No statements met the thresholds necessary to be considered as a point of common ground (at least 20 votes, and at least 70% agreement).

Differences of opinion: There was disagreement on how to address drug-related issues, with one statement highlighting the prevalence of public drug use and its impact on families, while another proposed fines and community service for those caught using drugs in public. [comment_592,comment_593]

Street lighting and visibility (22 statements)

This topic included 5 subtopics, comprising a total of 22 statements.

Inadequate street lighting in public paths and walkways (8 statements)

This subtopic had high alignment compared to the other subtopics.

Prominent themes were:

• Insufficient Lighting in Public Paths: Many statements highlight inadequate street lighting in walkways, parks, and public areas as a safety concern.
• Youth Congregation and Nighttime Activity: Several statements mention groups of teenagers gathering in poorly lit areas, often linked to perceptions of safety.
• Infrastructure and Maintenance Issues: Some statements point to broader infrastructure problems, such as potholes, deteriorating gutters, or poorly maintained paths, alongside lighting concerns.
• Need for Enhanced Safety Measures: Statements propose additional solutions like community wardens, police presence, or traffic systems to complement improved lighting.
• Seasonal and Environmental Challenges: A few statements reference winter darkness, icy conditions, or excessive lighting in certain areas as contributing to safety issues.

Common ground: No statements met the thresholds necessary to be considered as a point of common ground (at least 20 votes, and at least 70% agreement).

Differences of opinion: There was disagreement on community safety concerns, with one statement highlighting poor street lighting in Wemyss Bay and youth gatherings, while another proposed traffic lights at Bow Road for safer crossing. Other statements called for improved lighting in public paths, more wardens, and better maintenance of infrastructure like gutters and roads. Some participants also raised issues like fly tipping, rodent problems, and the need for better winter road maintenance. [comment_598,comment_608,comment_626,comment_649,comment_657,comment_677,comment_666,comment_568]

Dark areas and blind spots in neighborhoods (5 statements)

This subtopic had high alignment compared to the other subtopics.

Prominent themes were:

• Inadequate Lighting: Many statements highlight dark areas and poorly lit paths as key safety concerns.
• Lack Of Visibility: Some statements mention obstructed visibility due to trees, bushes, or dark clothing as a safety issue.
• Insufficient Patrols: Several statements express frustration over the absence of police or wardens in problematic areas.
• Youth Gatherings And Behavior: Multiple statements cite large groups of young people or reckless behavior (e.g., biking without lights) as intimidating or dangerous.
• Limited Safe Spaces For Youth: One statement notes the lack of designated areas for young people to gather at night.

Common ground: No statements met the thresholds necessary to be considered as a point of common ground (at least 20 votes, and at least 70% agreement).

Differences of opinion: There was disagreement about the overall safety of the community, with one statement noting a lack of police presence on the bike track near Montrose Avenue and Kilmacolm, while another expressed feeling safe in Port Glasgow but not at night. Some participants highlighted concerns about reckless cyclists, large gatherings of young people, and poor lighting, while others suggested solutions like increased lighting, police patrols, CCTV, and self-defense workshops. Another comment mentioned feeling unsafe on specific walking paths due to poor visibility. [comment_569,comment_594,comment_635,comment_595,comment_609]

Lighting in parks and recreational areas (4 statements)

This subtopic had high alignment compared to the other subtopics.

Prominent themes were:

• Importance Of Park Lighting For Safety: Statements highlight that adequate lighting in parks like Battery Park and Gourock Park is crucial for preventing accidents and enhancing safety.
• Inadequate Lighting In Specific Areas: Some statements point out insufficient lighting in areas such as the entrance to Gourock Park and Binnie Lane, posing safety risks.
• Concerns About Excessive Lighting: A statement notes that lighting in Battery Park may be excessive, raising concerns about cost and light pollution despite safety benefits.
• Vandalism And Maintenance Issues: Statements mention vandalism (e.g., burned seating in Gourock Park) and the need for better maintenance alongside lighting improvements.
• Lighting As A Deterrent For Unwanted Behavior: Statements suggest that improved lighting can deter issues like illegal parking in parks (e.g., Gourock Park).

Common ground: No statements met the thresholds necessary to be considered as a point of common ground (at least 20 votes, and at least 70% agreement).

Differences of opinion: There was disagreement on lighting, with one statement praising the new lighting in Battery Park while another called it excessive and costly. Participants also differed on enforcement, with one calling for more police or warden presence and another criticizing the lack of follow-up after reporting issues. Concerns about pavement conditions and inadequate street maintenance appeared in multiple comments. [comment_642,comment_649,comment_587,comment_638]

Brightness and adequacy of street lighting (4 statements)

This subtopic had high alignment compared to the other subtopics.

Prominent themes were:

• Inadequate Street Lighting Brightness: Statements highlight concerns about insufficient brightness in street lighting, particularly in specific areas like crossings.
• Need for Improved Street Lighting Coverage: Statements call for better or increased street lighting in various locations to enhance safety.
• Maintenance of Existing Lighting: Statements emphasize the importance of ensuring street lights are functional and well-maintained.
• Safety Concerns in Specific Areas: Statements mention particular spaces or neighborhoods where lighting inadequacies contribute to feelings of unsafety.
• Link Between Lighting and Reporting Confidence: Statements associate better lighting with increased confidence in reporting safety concerns.

Common ground: No statements met the thresholds necessary to be considered as a point of common ground (at least 20 votes, and at least 70% agreement).

Differences of opinion: There was disagreement on how to address safety concerns, with one statement proposing improved street lighting and another suggesting increased police presence and CCTV coverage. Another statement highlighted traffic and speeding issues, while yet another mentioned funding challenges for community initiatives. [comment_658,comment_680,comment_635,comment_589]

Lighting at bus stops and transport hubs (3 statements)

This subtopic had high alignment compared to the other subtopics.

Prominent themes were:

• Safety Concerns At Night: Poor lighting at bus stops contributes to feelings of unsafety, particularly after dark.
• Vandalism And Group Behavior: Groups causing damage and intimidation at bus stops, such as at Greenock Bus Station, raise safety concerns.
• Infrastructure And Accessibility Issues: Inadequate pavements, non-wheelchair-accessible curbs, and poor road signage affect safety around transport hubs.
• Traffic And Speeding Risks: Unenforced speed limits and congestion near bus stops, like on Bridge of Weir Road, pose safety hazards.
• Need For Increased Surveillance: Requests for greater police and community warden presence in the evenings to address safety issues at bus stops.

Common ground: No statements met the thresholds necessary to be considered as a point of common ground (at least 20 votes, and at least 70% agreement).

Differences of opinion: There was disagreement about specific safety concerns, with one statement highlighting issues at Greenock Bus Station due to groups causing damage and intimidation, while another raised concerns about unsafe road crossings, inadequate pavements, and traffic congestion in the village. Another statement mentioned fears related to the local fireworks display and poor lighting at bus stops at night. [comment_621,comment_684,comment_596]

Infrastructure and pavement conditions (16 statements)

This topic included 4 subtopics, comprising a total of 16 statements.

Pavement maintenance and accessibility (10 statements)

This subtopic had high alignment compared to the other subtopics.

Prominent themes were:

• Pavement Condition And Maintenance: Statements frequently highlight poorly maintained, uneven, or damaged pavements as safety hazards, particularly for vulnerable users like wheelchair users or the visually impaired.
• Accessibility Barriers: Concerns are raised about pavements being too narrow, obstructed by parked cars, or lacking wheelchair-accessible curbs, limiting mobility for disabled individuals.
• Traffic And Speeding Issues: Multiple statements mention unsafe roads due to speeding, lack of enforcement, and inadequate traffic calming measures like speed cameras.
• Lighting And Visibility: Inadequate lighting in parks, lanes, and streets is cited as a safety risk, especially in poorly maintained or high-traffic areas.
• Reporting And Awareness Gaps: Some statements note confusion over how to report safety concerns and call for clearer communication from local authorities.

Common ground: No statements met the thresholds necessary to be considered as a point of common ground (at least 20 votes, and at least 70% agreement).

Differences of opinion: There was disagreement on community safety concerns, with one statement highlighting uneven pavements on Campbell Street as a tripping hazard while another pointed to cars parked on pavements blocking access for people with disabilities. Another statement raised issues with rodent activity and overgrown grass in Kestrel Crescent, whereas a different comment emphasized the need for better road signage and traffic enforcement on Bridge of Weir Road. Some statements also called for improved lighting in areas like Gourock Park and Binnie Lane, while others focused on maintenance issues like potholes and smelly drains. [comment_656,comment_601,comment_684,comment_637,comment_643,comment_642,comment_627,comment_649,comment_639,comment_679]

Potholes and road surface damage (6 statements)

This subtopic had high alignment compared to the other subtopics.

Prominent themes were:

• Road Surface Damage: Statements frequently highlight potholes and uneven pavements as persistent issues affecting local roads and walkways.
• Maintenance Neglect: Statements mention a lack of timely repairs and general upkeep for roads, pavements, and drains.
• Safety Concerns From Infrastructure: Statements link poor road conditions and damaged pavements to feelings of unsafe environments.
• Unclear Reporting Processes: Statements express confusion or uncertainty about who to contact for reporting infrastructure or safety issues.
• Demand For Improved Infrastructure: Statements call for road resurfacing and repairs to address potholes and other surface damage.

Common ground: No statements met the thresholds necessary to be considered as a point of common ground (at least 20 votes, and at least 70% agreement).

Differences of opinion: There was disagreement on how to address community safety concerns, with one statement proposing more frequent warden or police presence while another suggested moving community meetings online. Some participants highlighted infrastructure issues like potholes and uneven pavements, while others emphasized the need for clearer reporting mechanisms for safety concerns. Another statement praised new lighting in Battery Park but still called for more lighting in other areas. [comment_601,comment_643,comment_597,comment_587,comment_666]

Drainage and gulley maintenance (3 statements)

This subtopic had high alignment compared to the other subtopics.

Prominent themes were:

• Drainage And Gulley Maintenance: Statements highlight concerns about smelly drains and gulleys not being maintained.
• Pavement And Road Maintenance: Statements mention uneven pavements, potholes, and the need for better maintenance to prevent accidents.
• Lighting And Safety: Statements call for improved lighting in parks and lanes to enhance safety for pedestrians.
• Multi-Agency Collaboration: Statements suggest the need for more innovative thinking and cooperation between agencies to address local issues.
• Seasonal Maintenance Needs: Statements point out the need for road sweepers, gritters, and sand in icy conditions for safety.

Common ground: No statements met the thresholds necessary to be considered as a point of common ground (at least 20 votes, and at least 70% agreement).

Differences of opinion: There was disagreement on specific safety priorities, with one statement highlighting poor maintenance of drains, pavements, and potholes, while another emphasized the need for better lighting in areas like Gourock Park and Binnie Lane, as well as improved road sweeping and gritting. Another statement also raised concerns about reservoir upkeep and called for more collaborative problem-solving between agencies. [comment_643,comment_627,comment_649]

Road and pavement width and congestion (2 statements)

This subtopic had high alignment compared to the other subtopics.

Prominent themes were:

• Road Safety Concerns: Statements highlight unsafe conditions on specific roads, such as the Bridge of Weir road, due to speeding and lack of enforcement.
• Inadequate Pavement Width: Statements mention narrow pavements, like the one outside Inverkip Hotel, causing difficulties for pedestrians, especially when large vehicles pass by.
• Accessibility Issues: Statements point out that some pavements and curbs do not meet modern accessibility standards, particularly for wheelchair users.
• Traffic Congestion: Statements express concerns about traffic congestion in the village and suggest solutions like pedestrian days to promote walking and cycling.
• Need for Better Road Signage: Statements call for improved signage on roads throughout the village to enhance safety and navigation.

Common ground: No statements met the thresholds necessary to be considered as a point of common ground (at least 20 votes, and at least 70% agreement).

Differences of opinion: There was disagreement about specific safety concerns, with one statement highlighting the narrow pavement and speeding vehicles near Inverkip Hotel, while another raised issues with the unsafe Bridge of Weir road, inadequate walkway accessibility, traffic congestion, and poor road signage in the village. [comment_636,comment_684]

Public transport and accessibility (12 statements)

This topic included 4 subtopics, comprising a total of 12 statements.

Safety and security on public transport (6 statements)

This subtopic had high alignment compared to the other subtopics.

Prominent themes were:

• Public Transport Availability: Statements highlight concerns about limited or early-ending public transport services, forcing reliance on taxis for nighttime safety.
• Youth Behavior and Gatherings: Statements mention intimidating behavior from groups of young people, particularly in public spaces like beaches, parks, and trains.
• Infrastructure and Accessibility Issues: Statements identify unsafe road crossings, poor lighting, narrow pavements, and lack of wheelchair accessibility as safety concerns.
• Police and Enforcement Presence: Statements call for increased police presence on trains, at beaches, and in schools to address safety and antisocial behavior.
• Community Wardens and Reporting: Statements discuss mixed confidence in community wardens and suggest using social media or other methods to report safety concerns.

Common ground: No statements met the thresholds necessary to be considered as a point of common ground (at least 20 votes, and at least 70% agreement).

Differences of opinion: There was disagreement on community safety concerns, with one statement highlighting issues like young people congregating at Inverkip beach, underage drinking, and intimidating train journeys, while another proposed installing more CCTV and increasing public transport to address loitering. Another comment focused on road safety, accessibility, and traffic congestion, suggesting pedestrian days and better signage, whereas a different statement emphasized police presence in schools, junction safety, and anti-social behavior like door-kicking. Additionally, one participant noted winter dangers and early bus service stops, while another called for more community wardens. [comment_665,comment_640,comment_684,comment_662,comment_657]

Public transport availability and frequency (5 statements)

This subtopic had high alignment compared to the other subtopics.

Prominent themes were:

• Limited Public Transport Availability: Statements highlight that reduced or withdrawn bus services restrict mobility, particularly for essential trips like hospital visits.
• Early Service Termination: Statements note that bus services ending early in the evening discourage people from going out, especially during darker winter months.
• Nighttime Safety Concerns: Statements express that limited or absent public transport at night forces reliance on taxis or walking, contributing to feelings of unsafety.
• Impact on Vulnerable Groups: Statements mention that older residents and workers are disproportionately affected by poor transport options, limiting their independence.
• Alternative Transport Demand: Statements suggest increasing taxis and public transport to address loitering and improve accessibility.

Common ground: No statements met the thresholds necessary to be considered as a point of common ground (at least 20 votes, and at least 70% agreement).

Differences of opinion: There was disagreement on how to address community safety, with one statement proposing the installation of more CCTV and increased public transport to deter loitering, while another highlighted the need for better-lit cycle tracks and later bus services to improve nighttime safety. Another comment suggested adding a zebra crossing or pedestrian island on Albert Road, and multiple statements noted that reduced bus services made travel difficult, particularly for older residents and hospital workers. [comment_672,comment_640,comment_657,comment_630]

Parking and congestion issues affecting transport access (5 statements)

This subtopic had high alignment compared to the other subtopics.

Prominent themes were:

• Speeding And Road Safety Concerns: Statements highlight unsafe conditions due to excessive speeding on Bridge of Weir Road and a lack of enforcement of the 20mph limit.
• Insufficient Parking Availability: Multiple statements mention inadequate parking spaces in the village, particularly near shops and community areas.
• Traffic Congestion And Pedestrian Access: Statements note congestion issues and suggest pedestrian-focused initiatives to reduce traffic and improve accessibility.
• Dangerous Driving Behaviors: Statements reference dangerous maneuvers like U-turns on pavements and general unsafe driving practices.
• Need For Improved Road Infrastructure: Statements call for better signage, wider pavements, and wheelchair-accessible curbs to enhance safety.

Common ground: No statements met the thresholds necessary to be considered as a point of common ground (at least 20 votes, and at least 70% agreement).

Differences of opinion: There was disagreement on community safety concerns, with one statement highlighting unsafe roads and inadequate infrastructure in Bridge of Weir, while another raised issues like antisocial behavior, drug problems, and unsafe public transport. Another comment proposed traffic lights to address speeding on Bridge of Weir Road, and yet another focused on poor parking at Grieve Road shops. [comment_684,comment_662,comment_675,comment_620]

Infrastructure for active travel (e.g., cycling, walking) (4 statements)

This subtopic had high alignment compared to the other subtopics.

Prominent themes were:

• Safety Concerns in Low-Light Conditions: Statements highlight dangers in poorly lit areas, particularly for active travel infrastructure like cycle tracks.
• Inadequate Pedestrian Infrastructure: Statements mention narrow pavements, lack of accessibility, and insufficient crossing aids like zebra crossings.
• Traffic Speed and Enforcement Issues: Statements express concerns about speeding and the lack of enforcement of speed limits on roads.
• Limited Public Transport and Accessibility: Statements note early bus service endings and insufficient bike parking, limiting mobility options.
• Community Engagement and Communication: Statements suggest improving communication between wardens, police, and the public, as well as using social media for safety updates.

Common ground: No statements met the thresholds necessary to be considered as a point of common ground (at least 20 votes, and at least 70% agreement).

Differences of opinion: There was disagreement on community safety concerns, with one statement highlighting unsafe roads and inadequate infrastructure in specific areas, while another pointed to poor lighting and early bus service endings as key issues. Another statement proposed solutions like pedestrian days and better signage, whereas a different comment suggested adding a zebra crossing or an island for safer street crossings. [comment_684,comment_685,comment_657,comment_630]

Community safety initiatives and prevention (9 statements)

This topic included 3 subtopics, comprising a total of 9 statements.

Nighttime safety and fear of going out (4 statements)

This subtopic had high alignment compared to the other subtopics.

Prominent themes were:

• Fear Of Nighttime Outings: Many statements express fear or reluctance to go out at night due to safety concerns.
• Perceived Lack Of Safety: Some statements highlight a general feeling of unsafety when walking at night.
• Traffic And Road Safety Concerns: One statement mentions traffic speed as a safety issue, suggesting the need for more traffic measures.
• Distrust In Current Punitive Measures: A statement indicates that community service is not seen as an effective deterrent, advocating for harsher punishments.
• Preferential Daylight Activity: One statement notes a preference for daytime outings to avoid perceived nighttime risks.

Common ground: No statements met the thresholds necessary to be considered as a point of common ground (at least 20 votes, and at least 70% agreement).

Differences of opinion: There was disagreement about the severity of safety concerns, with one statement noting no current issues while others expressed fear of going out at night. Participants also differed on solutions, with one suggesting stricter punishments for offenders and another proposing traffic measures. [comment_599,comment_645,comment_618,comment_582]

Preventative education and awareness (e.g., scams, personal safety, substance misuse) (4 statements)

This subtopic had high alignment compared to the other subtopics.

Prominent themes were:

• Proactive Safety Measures: Statements emphasize the need for preventative actions like locking property and avoiding scams.
• Community Education: Statements highlight the importance of teaching safety practices, such as self-defense and reducing unsafe behavior.
• Substance Misuse Awareness: Statements call for more discussions on drug misuse, especially among younger populations.
• Infrastructure Improvements: Statements suggest enhancing safety through better lighting and surveillance in high-risk areas.
• Collaborative Vigilance: Statements advocate for community-wide vigilance and police engagement to address safety concerns.

Common ground: No statements met the thresholds necessary to be considered as a point of common ground (at least 20 votes, and at least 70% agreement).

Differences of opinion: There was disagreement on how to improve community safety, with one statement proposing more preventative work, another emphasizing better drug education in schools and increased mobile CCTV, and others suggesting improved lighting, self-defense workshops, and community police advice on security and scam prevention. [comment_571,comment_607,comment_595,comment_634]

Proactive policing and community vigilance (2 statements)

This subtopic had high alignment compared to the other subtopics.

Prominent themes were:

• Community Safety Education: Statements emphasize the need for police to advise residents on practical safety measures like securing property and avoiding scams.
• Proactive Policing: Statements highlight the importance of prevention over reactive responses, with police presence needed before incidents occur.
• Vigilance Across Areas: Statements call for consistent vigilance in all parts of the community to maintain safety.
• Scam Prevention: Statements specifically mention the need to educate the public on avoiding door-to-door scams.
• Property Security: Statements stress the importance of securing homes, vehicles, and other possessions to deter theft.

Common ground: No statements met the thresholds necessary to be considered as a point of common ground (at least 20 votes, and at least 70% agreement).

Differences of opinion: There was disagreement on the role of police, with one statement emphasizing the need for proactive prevention rather than reactive responses, while another suggested police should focus on educating the community about safety measures and vigilance. [comment_588,comment_634]

Drug and substance misuse (6 statements)

This topic included 5 subtopics, comprising a total of 6 statements.

Public drug use and visibility (5 statements)

This subtopic had high alignment compared to the other subtopics.

Prominent themes were:

• Public Drug Use Visibility: Statements highlight concerns about open drug use in streets, pubs, and public spaces with little police intervention.
• Police Resource Limitations: Statements note insufficient police resources to address low-level drug use and broader community safety issues.
• Impact On Youth And Community Spaces: Statements identify specific areas where drug use and related behaviors make young people and residents feel unsafe.
• Link Between Drugs And Mental Health: Statements connect drug use to mental health struggles and crime, emphasizing systemic failures.
• Proposals For Enforcement And Prevention: Statements suggest fines, community service, or increased police presence as solutions to public drug use.

Common ground: No statements met the thresholds necessary to be considered as a point of common ground (at least 20 votes, and at least 70% agreement).

Differences of opinion: There was disagreement on how to address drug-related issues, with one statement proposing fines and community service for public drug use while another emphasized the need for police resources to tackle lower-level drug use. Another comment highlighted the broader impact of drugs and mental health on crime, while others pointed to specific concerns like open drug use in public spaces. [comment_581,comment_604,comment_592,comment_662,comment_593]

Law enforcement and policing resources (4 statements)

This subtopic had high alignment compared to the other subtopics.

Prominent themes were:

• Drug-Related Concerns: Statements highlight open drug use, its impact on families, and the need for police resources to address lower-level drug offenses.
• Police Resource Limitations: Statements note that police resources are stretched thin, affecting their ability to respond to community issues.
• Youth And Community Behavior: Statements mention misbehavior among children, gangs congregating in public spaces, and substance misuse at younger ages.
• Public Safety In Specific Areas: Statements identify unsafe spaces like beaches, trains, and parks, often linked to intimidating behavior or substance use.
• Community And School Engagement: Statements suggest increasing police presence in schools, using mobile CCTV, and fostering local discussions to address safety concerns.

Common ground: No statements met the thresholds necessary to be considered as a point of common ground (at least 20 votes, and at least 70% agreement).

Differences of opinion: There was disagreement on how to address drug-related issues, with one statement calling for fines and community service for public drug use, while another proposed increasing mobile CCTV vans in known dealing areas. Participants also highlighted concerns about police resources, youth behavior, and safety in public spaces like trains and beaches. [comment_592,comment_662,comment_593,comment_607]

Specific high-risk locations (3 statements)

This subtopic had high alignment compared to the other subtopics.

Prominent themes were:

• Drug-Related Concerns: Statements highlight drug misuse, including among young people, and call for increased awareness and surveillance in affected areas.
• Youth And Community Safety Issues: Statements identify specific locations (e.g., near shops, parks, beaches) where young people and residents feel unsafe due to intimidation, gangs, or misbehavior.
• Police And Enforcement Presence: Statements mention the need for greater police visibility, including in schools, on trains, and in high-risk areas, as well as the impact of closed police stations.
• Anti-Social Behavior: Statements describe incidents like door-kicking, public drinking, and rowdy behavior as persistent safety concerns.
• Reporting And Awareness Gaps: Statements note underutilized reporting channels (e.g., Fearless.org) and a lack of confidence or knowledge in reporting safety issues.

Common ground: No statements met the thresholds necessary to be considered as a point of common ground (at least 20 votes, and at least 70% agreement).

Differences of opinion: There was disagreement about the primary safety concerns, with one statement highlighting drug users and immigrants as the biggest issues for young people, while another emphasized school parking, junction safety, and antisocial behavior like door-kicking. Another comment focused on drug misuse among primary school children and called for more community discussions and mobile CCTV vans. [comment_581,comment_662,comment_607]

Youth and early-age substance misuse (2 statements)

This subtopic had high alignment compared to the other subtopics.

Prominent themes were:

• Early-Age Substance Misuse: Statements highlight concerns about substance misuse starting as early as primary school age.
• Community Drug Awareness: Statements emphasize the need for more effective discussions about drugs in local communities and schools.
• Dealing Hotspots: Statements identify specific areas where drug dealing is a known issue, requiring increased surveillance.
• Youth Safety Concerns: Statements note that young people feel unsafe due to drug users and specific groups in certain community spaces.
• Reporting Mechanisms: Statements mention that young people primarily report safety concerns to parents, youth workers, or family, with some awareness of Fearless.org.

Common ground: No statements met the thresholds necessary to be considered as a point of common ground (at least 20 votes, and at least 70% agreement).

Differences of opinion: There was disagreement on the primary safety concerns, with one statement highlighting drug users and immigrants as the biggest issues for young people, while another emphasized the broader problem of drugs and the need for community discussions and increased surveillance. [comment_581,comment_607]

Community education and prevention (2 statements)

This subtopic had high alignment compared to the other subtopics.

Prominent themes were:

• Substance Misuse Concerns: Statements highlight the impact of drugs and alcohol on community safety, including early-age misuse.
• Community Education Needs: Statements emphasize the need for more effective discussions about drugs in local communities and schools.
• Surveillance And Enforcement: Statements suggest increasing mobile CCTV vans in known drug-dealing areas to aid police efforts.
• Media Perception Of Safety: Statements note that media coverage may contribute to the perception of the town as unsafe.
• Preventive Activities: Statements propose meaningful activities as a way to address addiction and its effects on safety.

Common ground: No statements met the thresholds necessary to be considered as a point of common ground (at least 20 votes, and at least 70% agreement).

Differences of opinion: There was disagreement on how to address substance misuse, with one statement suggesting meaningful activities to combat addiction while another proposed increasing mobile CCTV vans in known dealing areas. [comment_604,comment_607]

Other (8 statements)

This topic included 1 subtopic, comprising a total of 8 statements.

Perceptions of safety in specific areas (4 statements)

This subtopic had high alignment compared to the other subtopics.

Prominent themes were:

• Perceived Evening Unpleasantness: Some statements describe specific areas as unpleasant or unsafe during evening hours.
• Violent Crime Concerns: Some statements highlight serious incidents like murders in central areas as a safety concern.
• Feeling Safe in Residence: Some statements express a sense of safety in personal living spaces, such as high flats or sheltered housing.
• Lack of Solutions for Social Issues: Some statements acknowledge safety concerns but note uncertainty about how to address broader social problems.
• Positive Neighborhood Experiences: Some statements mention feeling safe due to supportive neighbors or community environments.

Common ground: No statements met the thresholds necessary to be considered as a point of common ground (at least 20 votes, and at least 70% agreement).

Differences of opinion: There was disagreement about community safety, with one statement noting a sense of safety in the area while another highlighted concerns about recent murders in the central area. [comment_681,comment_600,comment_650]